Search This Blog

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Archbishop of Canterbury succession race begins in earnest




From the Guardian  September 20, 2012 - By Andrew Brown

Next Wednesday, four women and 15 men on the Crown Nominations Commission will gather for two days of prayer and horsetrading to replace Rowan Williams as archbishop of Canterbury. We know who they are, and when they will meet – but not where, so they can't be doorstepped.
Only three members of the commission, chaired by the former Conservative arts  minister Lord Luce, are bishops. One of the women and two of the men have no vote, but are there to advise. Five, including one of the women, are priests. The rest are lay people. Almost all the parties of the church are represented and there is even Dr Barry Morgan, a Welshman, to represent the rest of the world for the first time in this process. They will pick two names to present to the prime minister, who is bound to choose the first, unless he proves unable to take the job.
The man they choose will have at least five jobs at once in his new post, and very little power in any of them. He is a bishop in Kent. He sits in the House of Lords. He chairs meetings of the bishops of all England. In some very nebulous sense he is also the leader of the Anglican communion, a worldwide body with no agreed doctrine and no discipline, which has rejected all attempts to supply it with either. If the Queen dies, he will crown her successor. When the nation requires religious pageantry, he must supply it and star in it.
"The next man has got to be able to hold together the Anglican communion, and to stare down the loony left and the loony right on sexual questions," says Stephen Kuhrt, a south London vicar who represents centrist evangelical opinion. "There are those who want a split as soon as possible, but the vast majority of Anglicans want a working compromise on sexuality. We need someone who can communicate a bit more on a popular level than Rowan, and is a bit tougher."
This time last year the two main candidates were John Sentamu, the archbishop of York, and Richard Chartres, the bishop of London. Neither filled the church with much enthusiasm. Sentamu wanted the job too obviously. Chartres has refused to ordain women. Both men are in their 60s, and Sentamu is not in perfect health. This matters because if one of the jobs of the archbishop is to run the Anglican communion – well, to head it, since it is not a body coherent enough to run – he must be in shape for the next Lambeth Conference in 2018, when most of the Anglican bishops of the world will come together.
During the Occupy crisis last year, Charters originally wanted the protestors cleared away, but after Giles Fraser resigned the bishop reversed position with blinding speed and conviction. Chartres is hugely experienced, having served as Robert Runcie's chaplain, and he can point to the fact that church attendance in his diocese has grown over the last decade.
Sentamu's qualifications are drive, intelligence and a gift for theatre. As a black African former asylum seeker he is able to praise British patriotism extravagantly. He seems at home as a columnist for the Sun on Sunday, where he writes things such as: "We shouldn't be shy about saying how great our country is." He inspires devotion in his staff but two people separately said to me he will never get the job because he sat on the appointments committee for five years, and some of his former colleagues there are determined that he should not. He has drifted out in the betting.
"John Sentamu is a great public face for Christianity in this country, but not a great manager of people," says Kuhrt. "Of course, in this job you do have to challenge the Captain Mainwarings if you want anything to happen."
Beyond them, candidates are less obvious. Among the younger bishops the bookies early anointed Christopher Cocksworth, bishop of Coventry, as favourite. He is an evangelical, ran a theological college, and he hasn't offended any powerful lobbies. But reports from his diocese suggest that he hasn't offended anyone only because he can't take decisions. Sentiment has quietly but decisively swung away from him.
James Jones, the bishop of Liverpool, who has just chaired the Hillsborough inquiry, is another possible caretaker choice. Although he has a firm evangelical background, he is sympathetic to gay clergy and an enthusiastic green. He had heart surgery last year, and though a fluent speaker, he lacks the star quality possessed in their different ways by both Sentamu and Chartres.
Graham James, the bishop of Norwich, is favourite everywhere of the steady-as-she-goes party. He is widely experienced – he worked in Lambeth Palace under the previous archbishop, Lord Carey – and widely trusted, as well as scholarly. But critics say he has the charisma of a tea cosy and exemplifies the benevolent but out-of-touch quality of a church cut off from the mainstream of English life.
Outsiders include Nick Baines, the newly appointed bishop of Bradford. He is active on Twitter, where journalists notice him, and he is both interested in the media and largely unafraid of it. He is an evangelical, which ticks one important box, but youth (he's 51) and inexperience should tell against him.
Another possible is John Inge, bishop of Worcester, a former public schoolmaster favoured by some centrist evangelicals. He is the author of an unlikely work of theology, Living Love, which takes as its starting point the detective novels of Alexander McCall Smith.
Liberals make wistful noises about Stephen Cottrell, the bishop of Chelmsford. He was the man with briefly the worst job in the church – brought in as the unimpeachably heterosexual bishop of Reading after Williams lost his nerve in the face of a concerted and international evangelical campaign and forced his old friend Jeffrey John, a celibate gay man, to withdraw from the post. That was in many ways the defining catastrophe of Williams's term in office, and his surrender ensured that bitter infighting over gay clergy would continue for the foreseeable future.
"Stephen Cottrell has got nous, native wit, and common sense. It is an impossible job, but we are ready for someone to say, when a crisis comes along, like the banking crisis, 'Look, this is bad' and to do so in a joined up, cogent, and clear way," says Rachel Boulding, deputy editor of the Church Times.
But Cottrell also has limited experience and is too friendly to gay clergy and gay rights to be acceptable to most evangelical opinion.
This leaves the dark horse, whom no one was discussing a year ago, yet now seems to lead the field: Justin Welby, the bishop of Durham. The reason why Welby was never discussed earlier is also the big strike against him. He wasn't even a bishop this time last year, but dean of Liverpool. He was only consecrated as bishop in the new year. This also means that he has made no enemies yet.
Welby is an evangelical; he's also an old Etonian. But people who might be repelled by either or both of these traits tend not to be in practice. He charmed Giles Fraser, for example. He is thoughtful about the Church of England's problems. If these were primarily financial, he would be the outstanding candidate. Not only did he have a successful career as an oil trader before seeking ordination, he turned around the finances of Liverpool Cathedral when he ran it.
None of the candidates will bring comfort to a Tory government. The most establishment candidates are Chartres and Welby. But Chartres is a Prince Charles-type Tory who wants less capitalism and more hierarchy. Welby has been an informed critic of the banks. Sentamu was stopped and searched eight times by the Metropolitan police while he was bishop of Stepney, and served on the Macpherson committee that accused the force of institutionalised racism.
Whoever he is, the next archbishop will face other large problems, even though the issue of female bishops will probably not be among them. It looks as if a form of words has been agreed which both supporters and opponents can accept, so that the first will be consecrated next year.
The struggle over gay clergy will continue for the foreseeable future. Opinion within congregations is slowly shifting as it has shifted in the outside world. But the long stalemate, punctuated by vicious little skirmishes, can only be expected to continue.
There is the slow international fissioning of the Anglican communion, where conservative Africans and Asians have been trying for years to throw out the more liberal churches of North America, with the Church of England caught uneasily between factions. It's difficult to see any compromise there except the peace of exhaustion.
With all these difficulties at home and abroad it's lucky that the Crown Nominations Commission believe in prayer, since prayer will work at least as well as horsetrading when it meets next week to choose its victim.


Friday, September 14, 2012

From the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh Pre-Convention Journal

+Bob Duncan speaking at St. David's
Anglican Church, May 2011

Words of encouragement written by Archbishop Bob Duncan in this year's Pre-convention Journal which was just published today:

"At last Convention we heard powerful testimonies from St. James Penn Hills and All Saints Rosedale about the bravery and the blessing associated with moves from historic buildings to facilities shared with other Christian congregations.  In the course of this year, St. David’s Peters Township became Redeemer South Hills in a monumental transition to a former Catholic Church worship site in Canonsburg.  (Since re-locating they have had both the Primate of the Southern Cone and the Primate-elect of Uganda as preachers,a sign of the global encouragement our diocesan family continues to receive for being willing to pay a price for the Faith once for all delivered to  the saints.)  Prince of Peace Hopewell has moved a stone’s throw to a vacated Christian Missionary Alliance building.  St. Paul’s Monongahela has become True Vine Anglican Church and has moved a mile along Main Street to a neighborhood where, as the Junior Warden has described it, “we have turned a bar into a church.”   The leadership required to make these transitions has been monumental.  The discipleship required to embrace these changes is also something that generations to come will undoubtedly point back to as among the “finest hours” of their histories".  

Friday, August 31, 2012

UPDATED 9/6/12: Don't Be Cruel Reprise

Oh well.  Here we go again.

I've been told that Church of the Atonement Carnegie has returned to the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh on the decision of the Vestry which met without the Priest in Charge, the Rev. Dab Carr. Deb was informed of their decision this past Tuesday and that her services were no longer needed.  The Senior Warden, an ACNA supporter, was unable to attend the meeting.   In Deb and Chuck Carr, they lost a tithing family.  I wonder if the new TEC clergyperson will tithe to Atonement?  Many in the small parish were not informed that the Vestry was making this decision.

It's been no secret that St. Paul's Monongahela has been preparing to leave their building for many months.  They planned to turn over their building, relinquish their name and start over as True Vine Anglican Church in a former Italian Club that they have bought and are rehabbing. They planned to leave on September 30. You would think TEC would be grateful they are getting a building free and clear and work with the Anglicans. But no,  they have been pressured to leave early so their last Sunday services are this weekend and they must vacate by next Friday.   The have been invited to share space with a local congregation of another denomination while they finish getting their new building ready. And just like our departure from St. David's the TECsters are refusing to honor the wishes of the congregation concerning memorial gifts.  Been there, done that, got the tee shirt.

I remember the words of their soon-to-be-retiring bishop, Ken Price, posted by me just one year ago,  “We have some principles to uphold, but we don’t want to be cruel,” said the Rt. Rev. Kenneth L. Price Jr., Bishop of Pittsburgh, in an interview with The Living Church. Price said the diocese consulted with David Booth Beers, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori’s chancellor, throughout the negotiations.

UPDATE: 9/6/2012

Dear Friends-

Fr. John and the Anglicans at St. Paul's Church in Monongahela have departed the building and will be moving into a renovated bar that we have converted into a church.  The new church will be consecrated by Archbishop Duncan on Sunday, October 14th.  Until then we will be worshipping at the First Christian Church.  Please make note of the new email address which is effective immediately.  There is also a new website which is still under construction at www.truevinechurch.net.

We praise the Lord for all He has done for us as we have journeyed to His promised land.  Please keep us in your prayers that we will remain faithful and obedient to His Will.

Blessings,
Fr. John+

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Two Congregations Celebrate Pentecost in New Locations: Redeemer Parish and Prince of Peace mark new beginning after loss of their buildings


From the latest issue of Trinity newsletter of the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh

The Anglican Parish of Christ the Redeemer, formerly St. David’s Anglican Church in Peters Township, and Prince of Peace Church in Hopewell celebrated Pentecost in their respective new locations on May 27. It was with great joy that both parishes were able to celebrate God’s provision of new buildings after the loss of their buildings. Both parishes relinquished their former properties to the local Episcopal Diocese at the end of May. Both parishes were able to secure new buildings from other denominations where congregations had merged to accommodate their mission and ministry.

Read it all and check out the pictures:  click on link and scroll down to page 20-21

http://www.pitanglican.org/media/Trinity_7-12_web.pdf

Sunday, August 26, 2012

350 Anniversary of the Great Ejection


I lifted this entire posting from the Rt. Rev. Steve Wood's blog "Treading Grain".  Steve was consecrated the first bishop of the Anglican Diocese of the Carolinas (ACNA) yesterday at the parish he serves as rector, St. Andrew's Mt. Pleasant.  May God bless your ministry Steve, and thanks for the posting.    
In church history today is famous not just for the Great Ejection in England in 1662, but as the day in 1572 that about 3,000 Huguenots (French Protestants) were killed in Paris in what is now referred to as the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre. 
DDW

J.I. Packer opens his book,A Quest for Godliness, with this evocative image:
On a narrow strip in the northern California coastline grow the giant Redwoods, the biggest living things on earth.  Some are over 360 feet tall, and some trunks are more than 60 feet around.  They do not have much foliage for their size; all their strength is in those huge trunks, with foot-thick bark . . . Some have actually been burned, but are still alive and growing . . . The Redwoods (to use a much cheapened word in its old, strict, strong sense) awesome.  They dwarf you, making you feel your smallness as scarcely anything else does.
California’s Redwoods make me thing of England’s Puritans, another breed of giants who in our time have begun to be newly appreciated.  Between 1550 and 1700 they too lived unfrilled lives in which, speaking spiritually, strong growth and resistance to fire and storm were what counted. As Redwoods attract the eye, because they overtop other trees, so the mature holiness and seasoned fortitude of the great Puritans shine before us as a kind of beacon light, overtopping the stature of the majority of Christians in most eras, and certainly so in this age of crushing urban collectivism, when Western Christians sometimes feel and often look like ants in an anthill an puppets on a string.
Today commemorates one of the sadder chapters in Anglican history, the 350th Anniversary of the Great Ejection.  The Anglican Bishop of Liverpool, J. C. Ryle, reflecting on the Ejection, described it as an “injury to the cause of true religion in England which will probably never be repaired.”
The Great Ejection followed the Act of Uniformity 1662. This Act was part of the Clarendon Code, which sought to reestablish the supremacy of the Anglican church following Cromwell’s Commonwealth by enforcing uniformity of religion and its practice throughout England.  In the year leading up to the Act of Uniformity there were consultations and consideration of proposals for the uniformity of public prayers and administration of the sacraments. On the face of it there seemed to be a genuine attempt at compromise which at one point produced a watered down episcopacy that may have been acceptable to many non conformists, including some Presbyterians. However the final Act was severe and the date for implementation was changed first from Michaelmas to Midsummer Day and then to St. Bartholomew’s Day.
The Act of Uniformity was explicit in its directives.  It stated that “every Parson, Vicar or other Minister whatsoever” was required on or before the Feast of St Bartholomew (hereafter known as “Black Bartholomew’s Day”), 24 August 1662, to use the new Prayer Book and read Morning  and Evening Prayers in his church; and in the presence of his congregation to make a declaration:
I, ….. do here declare my unfeigned assent and consent to all and everything contained in and prescribed in and by the Book entitled The Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the use of the Church of England, together with the Psalter and Psalms of David, pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches; and the Form and Manner of Making, Ordaining and Consecrating of Bishops, Priests and Deacons.
A further and more stringent oath was required of all persons ecclesiastical, curates, teachers, schoolmasters, professors:
 I… do declare that it is not lawful, upon any pretence whatsoever ,to take arms against the King; and that I do abhor that traitorous position of taking arms by his authority against his person, or against those that are commissioned by him; and that I will conform to the liturgy of the Church of England as it is now by law established: and I do declare that I do hold there lies no obligation upon me or on any other person, from the Oath commonly called The Solemn League and Covenant, to endeavour any change or alteration of government either in Church or State; and that the same was in itself an unlawful Oath, and imposed upon the subjects of this realm against the known laws and liberties of this Kingdom.
Any clergyman who failed to subscribe to this statement was to be ejected from the Church of England.
It is estimated that 2000 clergymen refused to conform to the edict and were ejected from their parishes and the Church of England. This group included Puritan luminaries such as John Owen, Richard Baxter, Edmund Calamy the Elder, Simeon Ashe, Thomas Case, John Flavel, William Jenkyn, Joseph Caryl, Thomas Brooks (Puritan), Thomas Manton, William Sclater, Thomas Doolittle and Thomas Watson. Biographical details of ejected ministers and their fates were later collected by the historian Edmund Calamy.
David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, perhaps more than anyone else, recovered and restored the works of the Puritans to the modern church.  In 1962 he delivered an address at Westminster Chapel’s Puritan Conference commemorating the tercentennial of the Ejection; an event Lloyd-Jones considered a watershed event on almost equal footing with the Reformation itself.  You can read Lloyd-Jones’ address in his book, The Puritans: Their Origins and Successors (in the chapter titled, “Puritan Perplexities – Some Lessons from 1640-1662″).
Following is a very brief summary of Lloyd-Jones’ delineation of the factors leading to Great Ejection and lessons learned from the Ejection.
Causes of the Great Ejection
The mixing of politics and religion. From the time of the English Reformation many prominent Anglican clergyman, and especially Archbishop Laud, held influence with the Monarch and other politically connected people. The Puritans had grievances with Laud and his party, as did others whose action were not motivated by religion as were the Puritans’. These disenfranchised parties banded together in an unscriptural alliance to fight a common enemy. “To mix politics with religion in the church is always a danger” (Lloyd-Jones, p. 61).
Divisions among the Puritans. “This is what makes the story a real tragedy. Fundamentally these men were all agreed about doctrine” (Lloyd-Jones, p. 61). But they had endless disagreements over other matters, especially the preferred manner of church governance. Among the various groups of Puritans, Lloyd-Jones particularly faulted the Presbyterians their divisive spirit noting that “they were the most intransigent” (p. 62). Ironically, the Presbyterians “were always ready to make agreements with the king,” but they tended to fight those with whom they were in agreement on the essential matters of the Christian faith.
The idea of a State-Church. “The Presbyterians believed in a State Church quite as much as the Anglicans” (p. 63). They inherited this position and continued to fight for their version of it rather than inquiring what the New Testament said about the nature of the church as it relates to the government. “The Presbyterians believed, quite as much as the Anglicans, that people should be compelled by Act of Parliament and the power of the State to submit to their particular view of the Church” (p. 65). While other groups simply wanted toleration to worship freely, the Anglicans and Presbyterians were fighting for supremacy, and the Anglicans won in 1662.
Lessons drawn from the Great Ejection
Gospel Priority.  The thing of supreme importance is “the gospel of salvation which is also ‘the gospel of the glory of God’” (p. 67).
Faithful Ministers.  “Coupled with that, there was their emphasis upon the necessity of having able and good ministers, and the primacy and the centrality of preaching.” (pp. 67-68).
Biblical Grounding.  Our view of the church should be in line with the New Testament. How should doctrine and practice be determined? Our faith should stand squarely on the Scriptures.
Careful Discernment.  Our divisions should be over the fundamental matters of the faith, not things of lesser importance. Lloyd-Jones argued against a divisive spirit that refused to budge on non-essential matters. He notes that to the intransigent there are no “non-essential” matters, every ditch is worth dying in, every matter of doctrine and manners are black and white.
The Battle is Spiritual.  And we must fight the battle “in a spiritual manner, and not with carnal weapons” (p. 70). Many Presbyterians actually allied themselves with those who despised and opposed them to gain political advantage. Some Puritans, like John Owen, stood against such carnality, and so should we. If we view party success as more important than the glory of God and the purity of the Church, “our cause is already lost” (p. 71).
The Ultimate Lesson?  Lloyd-Jones offers this: “‘The arm of flesh will fail you, ye dare not trust your own.” (p.72)  At the end of the day the work is the Lord’s and He will sustain (sometimes at great personal cost) your stand on His Word.
Lloyd-Jones closed his address, speaking of those who were ejected, with these apt words:
“We thank God for the memory of these men, who, having seen the position clearly, acted upon it at all costs. May God give us grace to follow in their train!”

Friday, August 24, 2012

New Church Plant: All Saints' Anglican Church, Midland TX

From Virtue Online:  All Saints' rector, the Rev. Tom Finnie, is a longtime friend and was formerly the assistant rector of Church of the Ascension Pittsburgh and rector of St Peter's Church Uniontown PA 


Also on the orthodox side of the fence, All Saints Anglican Church, Midland, Texas, is open for business and welcomes new visitors. "We are an Anglican Church. We are part of the Anglican Communion-a worldwide fellowship of churches that trace their history back to the Reformation in England. With over 80 million Anglicans worldwide, we are the third largest group of Christians in the world. Our faith is in Jesus Christ and in his death and resurrection for us. We belong to the Anglican Church in North America and are part of the Anglican Diocese of the Southwest," affirmed Tom Finnie, its rector.

"We are a new congregation. Launched in May of 2012, we are a younger congregation with approximately 80 members-25 being under 18. Our worship is joyful and reverent with biblical preaching and Holy Communion each week. Our music includes the best of the traditional hymns and many newer songs you might hear on Christian radio.

"We worship at 5:30 on Sunday evenings. While we are seeking a permanent home, we worship now at Grace Lutheran Church (Missouri Synod) at 3000 West Golf Course Road in Midland. Our Sunday School for all ages begins at 4:15pm with worship beginning at 5:30pm.

"We would love to meet you. Our members include lifelong Anglican Christians and those who have just discovered us. You can email us at allsaints@midlandanglican.org with any questions or comments. We would be honored to hear from you."

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Our Daughter Hannah and the Olympics

Our daughter Hannah is a Senior Fashion Designer with Ralph Lauren, living and working in New York City.  She is the designer of the hats worn by the United States participants at the closing ceremony held this evening.  Ralph Lauren has been the designers of all the team uniforms beginning with the 1976 Olympic games.  There was a big hullabaloo when it was revealed that the uniforms for these Olympics were manufactured in China.  The media (excepting Fox News) and the politicians for the most part didn't address the issue as to why Ralph Lauren had the goods manufactured in China in the first place?  Perhaps it was the high cost of manufacturing clothing in the United States due to the high cost of labor, thanks in good measure to the textile unions.  Nonetheless, Ralph assured the faux angry politicians that even though it was too late to make changes in time for the 2012 games, from here on out all uniforms would be manufactured stateside.

Must say I am quite proud of our daughter and the artistic gifts she inherited from her mother!